(Image source: ACORD.)

ACORD (Little Falls, N.J.) has released its 2026 Insurance Digital Maturity Study, finding that just seven percent of the world’s largest insurers achieve a level of digital maturity associated with sustained outperformance—reinforcing a widening gap between leaders and the rest of the market.

The study, which analyzed 210 insurers representing roughly 60 percent of global premium, finds that digital maturity is no longer defined by the presence of technology, but by how effectively carriers translate digital capabilities into measurable business outcomes.

While nearly one-third of insurers have digitized across the value chain, fewer than one in ten qualify as “Digital Competitors,” the top maturity tier. The majority remain in intermediate stages, where investment is evident but execution remains inconsistent.

ACORD segments insurers into five categories based on digital maturity:

• Digital Competitors (7%): Market leaders leveraging end-to-end digital capabilities to shape customer and partner behavior, optimize performance, and strengthen strategic positioning
• Digitalized Firms (23%): Established adopters using digital to improve efficiency and effectiveness across core operations at scale
• Digital Aspirations (43%): Organizations investing with clear intent but still building the operating models needed to realize full value
• Localized Digitalization (20%): Carriers applying digital in isolated areas to address siloed problems, often in a cost-driven manner
• Digital Laggards (7%): Organizations with limited digital awareness and execution, leaving capabilities fragmented or largely manual

Execution, Not Spend, Drives Results

The report reinforces a theme that has surfaced repeatedly across recent carrier strategies: technology investment alone does not produce competitive advantage. Instead, performance is tied to how well digital capabilities are orchestrated across operations, data, and decision-making.

“For many insurers, core back-office operations remain largely manual and siloed, with digital efforts treated as a collection of discrete projects rather than a coordinated, enterprise-wide transformation program,” comments Dave Sterner, SVP, Research & Development, ACORD.

The study’s financial analysis underscores the point. Only Digital Competitors exceed average profitability, while also delivering the strongest long-term shareholder returns. According to the report’s performance comparison, these carriers achieve 254 percent 10-year total shareholder return, versus 180 percent for the next tier and 154 percent for mid-tier firms.

 

Notably, the 2026 edition marks a shift from prior years: even “Digitalized Firms”—carriers that have broadly modernized—no longer outperform on average. The bar has moved from digital adoption to sustained, enterprise-scale execution.

From Digital Projects to Operating Model

The study frames digital maturity as an operating model rather than a technology stack. Leaders distinguish themselves not by isolated capabilities, but by integrating digital across domains including data governance, process automation, customer platforms, and digital culture.

In practical terms, this means embedding automation, analytics, and AI directly into core workflows—underwriting, claims, and servicing—rather than layering digital tools on top of legacy processes.

Carriers in lower tiers, by contrast, tend to deploy point solutions to address specific problems, resulting in fragmented architectures and limited enterprise impact.

This distinction aligns with a broader industry pattern: the shift from “wrap-and-modernize” strategies toward integrated, end-to-end digital operating models.

AI Raises the Stakes for Digital Foundations

The report positions AI as both an accelerant and a stress test for digital maturity. While AI is driving productivity gains across underwriting, claims, and service, its ability to deliver enterprise value depends on underlying digital readiness.

“While AI is accelerating the industry’s ambitions, digital maturity is what determines whether those ambitions translate into durable advantage,” Sterner comments.

The study notes that AI initiatives frequently stall at the pilot stage in less mature organizations due to fragmented data, legacy systems, and lack of workflow integration.

Conversely, digitally mature carriers are able to scale AI across value streams—enabling faster quote-to-bind cycles, improved claims processing, and lower operating costs. The report estimates that AI could reduce expenses by as much as 14.6 percent for P&C insurers, representing hundreds of billions in potential industry savings.

Data Standards as a Scaling Mechanism

A notable finding is the correlation between digital maturity and the enterprise-wide use of ACORD data standards. Top-tier carriers deploy standards across the value chain, enabling interoperability, data reuse, and scalable AI deployment.

Less mature insurers, by contrast, tend to apply standards narrowly for compliance or limited integration.

This reinforces a key operational insight: data standardization is not simply a governance exercise, but a prerequisite for scaling both digital workflows and AI-driven decisioning.

A Structural Gap, Not a Temporary One

Taken together, the findings suggest that the industry is entering a new phase of digital competition—one in which incremental modernization is insufficient to close the gap with leaders.

Digital maturity is increasingly tied to structural capabilities: integrated operating models, disciplined investment frameworks, and the ability to continuously translate technology into business outcomes.

As the report concludes, digital maturity is no longer a technology aspiration, but a strategic requirement for competitive positioning and long-term value creation.

For insurers still in mid-journey, the implication is clear: the challenge is no longer deciding whether to invest in digital, but developing the organizational and operational discipline required to turn that investment into sustained performance.

ACORD Study Highlights Persistent M&A Execution Risk for Carriers